The Battle Over Non-Compete Agreements: What It Means for Business and Workers in America

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently banned non-compete agreements, a move that has sparked a legal battle with the US Chamber of Commerce and other trade groups. The coalition, led by Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, is seeking to have the rule voided and prevent the FTC from enforcing it.

The ban will harm the ability of these groups to protect confidential information and investments in their workforce, they argue. The regulator voted 3-2 to approve the rule, which bans most non-compete contracts that restrict workers from leaving for a competitor for a set period and in a specific geographic region. However, the FTC contends that their legal authority is clear and that addressing non-competes falls within their mandate.

The Chamber of Commerce has been a vocal critic of the FTC’s move to ban non-compete agreements. They believe that these agreements are governed by well-established state laws and not federal regulation. According to estimates by the FTC, around 30 million workers in the US are currently bound by non-compete contracts, impacting not only high-level executives but also hourly employees such as bartenders and security guards.

This legal battle between the regulator and business groups is likely to continue for months, leaving employers uncertain about the future of non-compete agreements. The outcome of this battle will have significant implications for both businesses and workers in America.

If you want to get your hands on more exciting content like this one for free, sign up for Roula Khalaf’s weekly newsletter curated by her as Editor of the FT. You won’t regret it!